A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court on Thursday dismissed the petitions of the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) and the state government, challenging the single bench order of debarring “tainted” candidates from appearing in the fresh recruitment examination.
Upholding the order of Justice Saugata Bhattacharya debarring identified tainted candidates from taking part in the fresh recruitment process, the Division Bench of Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das De dismissed the appeals of the WBSSC and the state government.
Appearing for the SSC, senior counsel Kalyan Banerjee argued that denying “tainted candidates” from taking part in the fresh hiring would tantamount to “double punishment”.
Stating that the Supreme Court, while cancelling the appointment of nearly 26,000 teaching and non-teaching staff, “was careful enough not to debar them from future employment”. “A penalty was imposed on them (tainted candidates) for committing the offence. They were asked to return their salary, and their jobs were taken away. Now, the question arises, will they get double punishment and be punished for life? Doesn’t it violate the Constitution? No criminal charges have been proved against these ‘tainted’ candidates, but stringent punishment has been imposed on them. If they are not allowed to participate, it will be double punishment,” Banerjee submitted
Advocate General Kishore Dutta, representing the state government, said: “The Supreme Court has given harsh punishment to the tainted candidates, but was careful enough not to debar them from future employment. Fundamental rights cannot be curtailed.”
However, senior counsel Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, appearing for the unsuccessful candidates, claimed that the Supreme Court in its order had not said that candidates can be appointed whose exam and results were declared void.
“The participation is confined to untainted and not specifically tainted. Tainted candidates cannot participate in the recruitment process. The state government and the SSC knew that tainted candidates were debarred from everything… The May 30th recruitment notice completely destroys the Supreme Court’s order. Where in the Supreme Court order does the State get ‘further vacancies’? This incorporation is directly misleading. With the introduction of new vacancies, the State wants to upset the Supreme Court’s judgment. The argument of double punishment has no bearing,” Bhattacharya told the High Court.
Senior counsel Aninda Mitra, representing the untainted candidates, claimed “circumstances were created by the tainted candidates in collusion with the officers of the Commission”.
“Prosecution cannot be two times, but for one prosecution, there can be multiple punishments. The Supreme Court had terminated their jobs and ordered them to refund money. So, two punishments were given by the Supreme Court. Thus, there is no question of double jeopardy,” Mitra said.
On April 3, the Supreme Court had upheld the Calcutta High Court order, which invalidated the appointment of over 25,000 teachers and non-teaching staff, recruited through the 2016 WBSSC examinations, terming the entire selection process “tainted beyond resolution” and calling for a fresh selection process to fill the vacancies. Later, the Supreme Court extended the services of “untainted” candidates employed as assistant teachers for Classes 9-12 until December 31, asking the state government to complete fresh recruitments by then.
A month later, the WBSSC issued a notification for the recruitment of over 35,000 school staff. Last Monday, the single judge HC bench debarred tainted candidates from the fresh recruitment.